Question |
Yes |
No |
Do you
think that the government has a case for the legislation which
it is proposing without providing further supporting evidence? |
2% |
90% |
Do you
think that the government may have a case if it can provide
further evidence in support of this? |
34% |
57% |
Do you
think that the Minister's Forward gives adequate weight to privacy
needs? |
0% |
93% |
Do you
think that enough time has been allocated for comment? |
5% |
88% |
Are
privacy issues given sufficient attention in this paper? |
0% |
93% |
Do you
support the proposals in respect of communications |
3% |
95% |
Do you
support the proposals in respect of stored data |
0% |
97% |
Do you
agree that the government should give an unequivocal undertaking
NOT to strengthen or extend existing export controls on non-TTP
based encryption products and services? |
88% |
6% |
Do you
agree that the government should give an unequivocal undertaking
NOT to introduce any controls on the development, sale or use
of encryption products intended for the UK domestic market? |
90% |
6% |
The
original proposals issued in June 1996 contained an explicit
undertaking that it was not the government's intention to regulate
or in any way control the use of encryption by private citizens
in the UK. This undertaking is now missing. Do you think that
the government needs to re-introduce this undertaking? |
94% |
4% |
To remove
suspicions that it is engaged in 'creeping legislation' the
government should explain how its proposals can meet its stated
objectives without taking the additional step of controlling
the availability and use of encryption products within the UK. |
91% |
3% |